the problem is that it is not in jest. It is accurate and reviews both how weak societal oversight of police is and how important it is. Officers are under scr

the problem is that it is not in jest. It is accurate and reviews both how weak societal oversight of police is and how important it is. Officers are under scrutiny. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, sometimes (not often enough for me) when that scrutiny fails changes happen. What is the oversight process, and the public input on that oversight, for Citizen? Your example is an argument specifically for not letting go of that scrutiny, and significantly increasing that scrutiny. It, to some, is an argument of why existing state sponsored efforts at law enforcement simply need to be rebooted entirely - because they operate with scrutiny more akin to a private corporation already.