3 ms·
That's just Amazon's policy, not some sort of fundamental constraint of Rails itself. While it's true Rails will use more ram than other options for a given tr
by jasonwatkinspdx 5y ago
That's just Amazon's policy, not some sort of fundamental constraint of Rails itself.
While it's true Rails will use more ram than other options for a given traffic level, many of us have scaled it just fine.
The techempower benchmarks aren't particularly useful for anything other than forum warrior style arguments. They don't really measure a realistic workload.
Your last sentence is entirely unnecessary.
- StreamBright 5y agoI agree, HN needs less and less facts nowadays and more feelings about somebodies favorite tool or framework. The quality of comments are going below Reddit levels.
- jasonwatkinspdx 5y agoYou are the one being emotional, and obnoxiously toxic at that. Everything I said is factual. Many of us have built successful startups on rails. I'm a very pragmatic person in general and abhor the cheering and jeering dynamic you're actively courting in this thread.
- dang 5y agoPlease don't perpetuate flamewars or tit-for-tat spats on HN. We're trying for something different here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- dang 5y agoPlease don't perpetuate flamewars or tit-for-tat spats on HN. We're trying for something different here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html