2 ms·
That statement is simply the plural form of the same circular argument.
by newaccount2021 5y ago
That statement is simply the plural form of the same circular argument.
- rusk 5y agoNot really. In my version the energy wastage is a means to an end. Not the end in itself. In particular, energy usage is not coupled to value. It is “collateral” damage. You could in theory replace it with some other proof of work ...