4 ms·
The SeL4 FAQ has this gem I'm struggling to say what's wrong with that claim from a scientific POV. As others also point out, security is conditional on vario
by GregarianChild 5y ago
The SeL4 FAQ has this gem
I'm struggling to say what's wrong with that claim from a scientific POV.
As others also point out, security is conditional on various things, including, in this case, what you consider a valid flow of information and what you don't. For example if an OS allows user-mode to read AES-encrypted kernel-mode data then that would be insecure if you had an unrestricted attacker (who can brute-force AES) but secure assuming polynomial attackers (under standard hardness assumptions for AES). To add insult to injury, we don't in fact know if the standard hardness assumptions actually hold for AES.
- roenxi 5y agoIt is obviously correct from a scientific perspective. Scientific experts probably wrote it.
- GregarianChild 5y agoWhat else would you have used as branding?
- roenxi 5y ago"Guarantee certain properties about the software".