or is her analysis flawed due to her own bias. i.e. when you go in with this belief to quote her "The results of this study are now as relevant as ever. Today,

or is her analysis flawed due to her own bias. i.e. when you go in with this belief to quote her "The results of this study are now as relevant as ever. Today, the New York Times continues its legacy of Palestinian erasure." how can one expect the results to be anything but something that reflects that. either the author would continue to tweak and tweak and tweak till they get the results desired or simply not publish something that contradicts their worldview.