6 ms·
Of course B primary motivator and I do not see that as a bad thing I am not sure why you think anyone or any company would DESIRE to have external actors impos
by syshum 5y ago
Of course B primary motivator and I do not see that as a bad thing
I am not sure why you think anyone or any company would DESIRE to have external actors imposes requirements on their actions or why it would be unpalatable to say you do not want to have regulatory burdens imposes on you
As a culture have we so lost the respect for freedom and liberty that is now bad if you want to have said freedom?
- cool_dude85 5y ago>I am not sure why you think anyone or any company would DESIRE to have external actors imposes requirements on their actions or why it would be unpalatable to say you do not want to have regulatory burdens imposes on you Of course they desire to have external actors impose requirements on their own actions and other people's actions and other companies' actions. Just so long as they think those requirements benefit their bottom lines. Ever hear of the business lobby opposing union-busting laws on the basis that they create regulatory burden?
- syshum 5y agounion "busting" laws generally speaking are about REMOVING regulations around who is required by law to negotiate with and/or join a union. So these laws by definition are not imposing any regulatory burden on anyone they are removing regulatory burdens
- ethbr0 5y agoFreedom and liberty to discriminate is a slippery freedom. For whom? When? In a choice between maximizing efficiency for good actors, and curtailing behavior by bad actors, I tend to weight the latter.