3 ms·
True, but the most of the examples people found are of companies that already have Colorado employees.
by NCFZ 5y ago
True, but the most of the examples people found are of companies that already have Colorado employees.
- refurb 5y agoRight, but this applies to job postings. Current employees don’t require any additional work as they’re already hired.
- waheoo 5y ago...
- paulgb 5y agoHere's the act, it looks like it does have some additional requirements for companies with CO employees: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb19-085 https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb19-085 If remote work sticks around (I think it will), it will be interesting to see how employers handle the additional burden of having employees in dozens or even hundreds of jurisdictions. I don't think it's insurmountable, but it's certainly something many companies have not had to deal with before.
- inter_netuser 5y agoThere are companies that automate a lot of this, specifically to support remote-first companies.
- rswail 5y agoThe same way they deal with the asinine US sales taxes or how international companies deal with hiring internationally. They'll outsource it to companies that look after it for them. This is the "resources" bit of "human resources". In the meantime, maybe the actual HR people could get back to being "people and culture" managers and stop thinking of staff as "resources".