7 ms·
I really like this new way of doing factoring, since 90% of the steps of the explanation are more intuitive and direct than the usual guessing techniques and th
by ivan_ah 5y ago
I really like this new way of doing factoring, since 90% of the steps of the explanation are more intuitive and direct than the usual guessing techniques and the complete-the-square technique that leads to the quadratic formula. I was so excited by this new approach that I started rewriting the parts in the math book that explain quadratics, and looking forward to getting rid of the complete-the-square procedure, which many readers find confusing.
However, the Po-Shen Loh method (a.k.a the Viète method) has one big conceptual hurdle at the beginning (the missing 10%), which I had trouble explaining, since it seems to come out of nowhere and not obvious:
> "Two numbers have a sum of 14 exactly when their average is 7."
> "Two numbers have an average is 7 when those numbers are 7-u and 7+u"
via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKBX0r3J-9Y&t=592s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKBX0r3J-9Y&t=592s
^ both these statements are true and correct, but they seem to come out of nowhere, like one of those "Suppose u = <complicated expression> ..." substitution tricks that are needed to solve certain calculus problems, which are otherwise impossible if you don't know the needed substitution.
The substitution 7-u and 7+u is related to the general idea that any two numbers (or functions) can be written in terms of a symmetric component m (half-sum, or mean) and a half-difference part d:
given any a, b
define:
m = (a+b)/2 (the half-sum of a and b)
d = (a-b)/2 (half-difference of a and b)
then:
a = m + d
b = m - d
Again, this is totally true (and a very useful math idea that comes up in other places), but not intuitive for beginners.
In the end I decided to stick with the complete-the-square approach: complete-the-square is not that bad, especially when you show the picture: https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/noBSmath_v5_preview.pdf#page=23 https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/noBSmath_v5_previe...
- jules 5y agoIt's easy to motivate using a picture. If you draw the parabola x^2 + bx + c then the minimum is at x = -b/2 and you can visually see that the average of the x-values of the roots is that minimum x = -b/2. So then u is simply the x-distance from the minimum to the roots. The more problematic step is the assumption that you can write the parabola as (x - r1)(x - r2). It isn't obvious why that is possible.
- rocqua 5y agoReplace the word "average" with the word "middle" and it might be a bit more obvious?