3 ms·
Doubt. CPU hasn't been the limiting hardware in a decade. I think Intel stagnated because people have prioritized spending money on GPUs, memory, and SSDs. Ev
by fdroidmstrrce 5y ago
Doubt.
CPU hasn't been the limiting hardware in a decade. I think Intel stagnated because people have prioritized spending money on GPUs, memory, and SSDs.
Even when I'm writing an intensive program, I'm using multiple cores, so a single threaded benefit is useless to me.
I have a half a mind to think the m1 is a marketing gimmick because making a better processor was low hanging fruit that CPU companies aren't trying to compete on(outside of price).
- hansel_der 5y ago> Even when I'm writing an intensive program, I'm using multiple cores, so a single threaded benefit is useless to me. maybe poorly worded but i would like to point out that a single-thred performance gain is never useless, not even with a highly a parallel workload. i would think that due to multi-stage cpu caches and ipc overhead, something within one core/thread will be way more efficient.