3 ms·
Hah. I was about to point this out and found your comment right at the top. > imo there is no good direct translation for creator in this context With this sp
by chmod775 5y ago
Hah. I was about to point this out and found your comment right at the top.
> imo there is no good direct translation for creator in this context
With this specifically I disagree. There are some perfectly good words, but since we get buried in anglicisms every day they tend to be way at the back of people's minds.
I also don't think this is auto-translation, because it's a very human mistake. A machine would have translated the word as "Schöpfer" or if it was context aware as "Urheber".
A human may have also chosen "Kreative" or even "Macher" (a favorite of the ad instustry!) instead.
- eloeffler 5y agoKreative is good though it still sounds a bit "wooden" :) I went through Leo translations and didn't find one that fit. I think "Macher" would miss the point though. And yes, it makes sense that this is a human translation given that "Kreator" is a very creative translation, hah.