4 ms·
If you don't think Wikileaks constitutes free speech, I'd be more curious how you define it yourself.
by trevelyan 15y ago
If you don't think Wikileaks constitutes free speech, I'd be more curious how you define it yourself.
- GHFigs 15y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generality http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generality
- trevelyan 15y agoI'm not "asking for approval". I'm asking for your definition of free speech.
- GHFigs 15y agoI told you how I interpret "free speech organization". If that interpretation is not what you meant, I'm not surprised: that's why I asked to you define what you meant in the first place. I had thought that asking for a clarification would help me understand what you actually mean, but you seem to be fixated on starting an argument about the generality instead. No, thanks.