4 ms·
Is HTML bloated? I was looking at CSS and it has specifications for circular background gradients. If we wanted a healthy, open web, with competition in clien
by dash2 5y ago
Is HTML bloated?
I was looking at CSS and it has specifications for circular background gradients.
If we wanted a healthy, open web, with competition in clients, wouldn’t it be a good idea to start off with something new?
- comex 5y agoThis is just a set of HTML attributes with no associated JavaScript API. Any client that doesn't care about enhanced screen reader functionality will be free to ignore them completely, and be no worse off than today. But it seems useful for clients – and users – who do care. Although, this does only work when web content authors actually use these attributes, and I'm not sure how common that will be…
- dvfjsdhgfv 5y agoI feel you both are right. The specs for web-related technologies become more and more bloated everyday, and the barrier to entry is already too high (even for a software monster such as Microsoft!). From this point of view, it can be seen as obstructing the open web. However, there should be no harm in adding optional specs for the interested parties, especially for niche uses. So this actually favors open web as it's better to have open standards rather than ad-hoc custom solutions.
- Tajnymag 5y agoIt seems they specifically used the data-* attributes. These are already a thing in the HTML5 spec and can be used for personal use. That means there isn't really much new for the clients/browsers to implement, except for the interpretation part. The parsing and DOM API already supports data attributes, so this spec only stands as a recommendation for content creators and screen readers to work with a officials standardized syntax. I'm actually surprised w3 didn't come with a completely new set of tags.