> especially given that animal testing is not a mechanism which typically results in improved treatment. The technique described in the article absolutely coul

> especially given that animal testing is not a mechanism which typically results in improved treatment. The technique described in the article absolutely could result in not just "improved treatment", but an actual cure. We know what causes CF. We know what causes many other genetic diseases. Right down to the individual bad DNA segment. And there is absolutely no way those treatments are ever going to be approved without animal testing. Sorry, they just aren't.