3 ms·
> Not to be snarky, but isn’t every part of a successful organism an evolutionary marvel? I prefer Stephen Jay Gould's point that lots of evolved subsystems ar
by the_af 5y ago
> Not to be snarky, but isn’t every part of a successful organism an evolutionary marvel?
I prefer Stephen Jay Gould's point that lots of evolved subsystems are just kludges and jury-rigged solutions that just happen to work good enough, sort of. ("The Panda's Thumb").