3 ms·
I think the issue isn't with Wasm support, it's the filesystem API. They could've included a polyfill though... But as that API is new it might not be available
by emteycz 5y ago
I think the issue isn't with Wasm support, it's the filesystem API. They could've included a polyfill though... But as that API is new it might not be available yet.
- dfabulich 5y agoIt's the "File System Access API," the one that allows the browser to read/write files on your actual computer. It's an I/O feature, impossible to polyfill. The similarly named "FileSystem API" gives you access to a sandboxed "virtual drive" in the browser. Firefox has supported that for years, and polyfills are possible, but it's irrelevant in this case. https://caniuse.com/?search=file%20system https://caniuse.com/?search=file%20system
- slver 5y agoI believe it still counts as a polyfill, even if it doesn't do what it says on the can (but it has compatible interface, so your app runs).