Like in every article I evalute like this: Open the website, look for title/text/diagrams proportions (here nearly only text and a lot of stuff around the artic

Like in every article I evalute like this: Open the website, look for title/text/diagrams proportions (here nearly only text and a lot of stuff around the article that doesn't matter for the article at all). Then I try to get the content of the article with reading headlines, bold/italic text and looking at the diagrams (result: only blabla, no errors). Then I downvalue an article that has 2 pages which only serves the website owner, not the reader at all (and I am the reader). Also I evaluate the article on what I find on page one, no content on page one = never click on page two. To put all together it was really not an article I want to read. Sorry. If you posted the link because you think the content is readable, maybe rework it in an own blog post next time, if the quality of the original is so low. It helps you twice. First readers will appreciate your delivery much more and second, you will get the traffic/fame and not the source page here. I hope my detailed analysis of why I can't suggest reading this article or giving you the +1 helped.