> Amazingly badly written You know they want ambiguity. It means MPs can dismiss objectors as irrational slippery slope proponents. Then when it's appended to

> Amazingly badly written You know they want ambiguity. It means MPs can dismiss objectors as irrational slippery slope proponents. Then when it's appended to the statute books it only takes a few judgements to 'clarify' the law. It's all downhill for freedom. The intention is clear. Voting is useless. The press have been silent to the point of compliance. It only takes a well placed messaging campaign and an unvigilant, ignorant public. At least we still have beer to see us through the long haul. See you at the pub.