3 ms·

Consent to mate is in fact fairly distinctive to human beings. It's certainly not a concept which applies to insects such as cicadas, which just jump on each ot

Consent to mate is in fact fairly distinctive to human beings. It's certainly not a concept which applies to insects such as cicadas, which just jump on each other and do the business.

scarmig 5y ago
Bedbugs are a particularly interesting species, in that they practice traumatic insemination[0]. The male, in order to overcome female resistance, rips through her abdomen to deposit his sperm. Large, confined bedbug colonies often go extinct for this reason: all the females end up dead from repeated traumatic insemination. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traumatic_insemination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traumatic_insemination
- samatman 5y ago
  Yep. Bedbugs are one of those species where I would have no objection at all to gene-driving them into oblivion.
js2 5y ago
> Consent to mate is in fact fairly distinctive to human beings. What? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtship_display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtship_display
- samatman 5y ago
  Sure, I said fairly distinctive rather than unique. It's interesting that monogamy and mostly-consensual sex are mostly found in some birds (not you ducks), rather than our closest relatives. There are a lot of mammalian paradigms for sex, for placental mammals in our weight class there's rather a lot of intramale competition, and estrus; the female being willing to be mounted by whatever male happens to win the fight is pretty much orthogonal to consent as we humans understand it. It seems like a pedantic objection given that both the parent and myself were talking about insects, where the concept makes very little sense.
  - js2 5y ago
    Fair enough. I read “fairly distinctive” as “virtually unique”. Mantis are an insect with a mating ritual, right? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347287800246 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00033...
    - samatman 5y ago
      > The courtship displays of the male and female may play the role of reducing intraspecific aggression during courtship and thus reducing the likelihood of cannibalism. Whew! I think this also has relatively little to do with consent as humans understand it!
thaumasiotes 5y ago
Other mating models: - Millipedes generally work on a model where males leave packets of sperm on the ground and females find them and pick them up. Mating does not take place. - Fish may just release sperm / unfertilized eggs into the ocean and hope they find each other. - Some mayflies have just four legs, the first pair having developed into "arms" whose only use is restraining a struggling female. - Male anglerfish drift around until they find a (much larger) female, at which point they burrow into her skin, attach permanently, and live as a parasite that occasionally releases sperm. Cicadas may not worry about consent, but insects and other crawly things in general do, as you can tell by the fact that they put on mating displays.

Consent to mate is in fact fairly distinctive to human beings. It's certainly not a concept which applies to insects such as cicadas, which just jump on each other and do the business.

scarmig 5y ago

Bedbugs are a particularly interesting species, in that they practice traumatic insemination[0]. The male, in order to overcome female resistance, rips through her abdomen to deposit his sperm. Large, confined bedbug colonies often go extinct for this reason: all the females end up dead from repeated traumatic insemination. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traumatic_insemination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traumatic_insemination

samatman 5y ago
Yep. Bedbugs are one of those species where I would have no objection at all to gene-driving them into oblivion.

js2 5y ago

> Consent to mate is in fact fairly distinctive to human beings. What? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtship_display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtship_display

samatman 5y ago
Sure, I said fairly distinctive rather than unique. It's interesting that monogamy and mostly-consensual sex are mostly found in some birds (not you ducks), rather than our closest relatives. There are a lot of mammalian paradigms for sex, for placental mammals in our weight class there's rather a lot of intramale competition, and estrus; the female being willing to be mounted by whatever male happens to win the fight is pretty much orthogonal to consent as we humans understand it. It seems like a pedantic objection given that both the parent and myself were talking about insects, where the concept makes very little sense.
- js2 5y ago
  Fair enough. I read “fairly distinctive” as “virtually unique”. Mantis are an insect with a mating ritual, right? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347287800246 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00033...
  - samatman 5y ago
    > The courtship displays of the male and female may play the role of reducing intraspecific aggression during courtship and thus reducing the likelihood of cannibalism. Whew! I think this also has relatively little to do with consent as humans understand it!

thaumasiotes 5y ago

Other mating models: - Millipedes generally work on a model where males leave packets of sperm on the ground and females find them and pick them up. Mating does not take place. - Fish may just release sperm / unfertilized eggs into the ocean and hope they find each other. - Some mayflies have just four legs, the first pair having developed into "arms" whose only use is restraining a struggling female. - Male anglerfish drift around until they find a (much larger) female, at which point they burrow into her skin, attach permanently, and live as a parasite that occasionally releases sperm. Cicadas may not worry about consent, but insects and other crawly things in general do, as you can tell by the fact that they put on mating displays.