3 ms·
"License to use as required" is similar enough to ownership that I do not think that the distinction between the two matters. I think that this is especially tr
by martey 15y ago
"License to use as required" is similar enough to ownership that I do not think that the distinction between the two matters. I think that this is especially true because Dropbox are the final arbiters of what is "required".
- dangrossman 15y agoYou want to give Dropbox the rights to show a thumbnail of your photos if you browse your folders through their website, without giving them the right to sell those photos to a tabloid magazine. Big difference, the distinction matters.