4 ms·
Interesting. I don't send cookies or keep personal data, so why do I need to worry about them? The only time I've got into issues was with an american firm usi
by iso1631 5y ago
Interesting. I don't send cookies or keep personal data, so why do I need to worry about them?
The only time I've got into issues was with an american firm using an american law (dmca) to attack me (a non-american) and my hosting company (a non-american hosting company)
- Permit 5y ago> I don't send cookies or keep personal data, so why do I need to worry about them? Can you share your website/service?
- frockington1 5y agoCommenting to follow up later. I'm really interested in the use case. The only thing I can think of would be a website similar to mid-2000s youtube to mp3 converters.
- iso1631 5y agoAlas they are all behind ssl authentication so you wouldn't be able to access them, but the stuff I currently have open includes a switch port mapper (every 20 minutes all my switches are scanned and reports generated on what's plugged in where), a firewall config interpretor (a list of current port forwards is generated), and a logging server showing me what But if you want an example of a fully featured public site which doesn't need cookies https://news.ycombinator.com/ https://news.ycombinator.com/ Load that in lynx, which asks for every cookie, and none are set. Now sure, if you choose to log in, then functionally you need to accept the login cookie, but that cookie isn't spammed out to you. Under GDPR, a website doesn't need to ask for permission to have necessary cookies which enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility.
- Permit 5y ago> Under GDPR, a website doesn't need to ask for permission to have necessary cookies which enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. I am not convinced this is true. See: https://law.stackexchange.com/a/32157 https://law.stackexchange.com/a/32157 Also note that HN is likely in violation of this since there is no "Remember Me" checkbox when logging in. There is no indication that logins will be persistent.
- Mediterraneo10 5y agoCommon CMSs send cookies by default. Even if you are one of those tech-inclined people using a static site generator for your own website, this is not the case for millions and millions of other websites.
- nfoz 5y agoThen let's replace those CMS's. [edited with less anger]
- maxrev17 5y agoReplace them? You need cookies for a tonne of reasons. It's really difficult to justify replacing half the web because some people abuse it. That's like replacing cars with walking because some people drink drive.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- iso1631 5y agoWhat reasons do you need the types of cookies you need to ask permission for under the GDPR?
- TheManInThePub 5y ago*sigh* Here we go again. The GDPR has no problem AT ALL with cookies. Use as many as you like with no need for popups. However, if you are using cookies to track or personally identify me, then you need to ask my permission to do so. And so you should. The amount of misinformation (some of it wilful) circulating about the GDPR on HN (a technical forum!) is shocking. If you consider yourself a professional developer then I strongly suggest you read a GDPR primer. There is no excuse not to. Following the GDPR will simply make your code safer when handling personal data.