I don't know the contract with clients or anything but "didn’t actually need to tell their customers" seems totally illegal to me if the RSA is the provider of

I don't know the contract with clients or anything but "didn’t actually need to tell their customers" seems totally illegal to me if the RSA is the provider of one of the most fundamental layer of security to large companies. It is a PR piece. Not saying that RSA likely did the best they could do to be secured from the hack, but this story is a pr piece.