3 ms·
It is already owned by an association, a non-profit called Freenode Limited.
by jlokier 5y ago
It is already owned by an association, a non-profit called Freenode Limited.
- jlokier 5y agoNice downvote for looking up a simple legal fact, to address the misleading impression from the GP that an individual person holds the domain. Perhaps this will be downvoted as well because the childishness is strong on this issue, but for the benefit of anyone who cares, the parent comment is at least technically correct (the best kind of correct). The domain at the centre of this controversy is owned by an incorporated non-profit association registered as a company limited by guarantee, not by a "someone".