That explanation only makes sense if you take alisonkisk's use of "worth" to mean "price", which makes it a very different comment. That all packs with price l

That explanation only makes sense if you take alisonkisk's use of "worth" to mean "price", which makes it a very different comment. That all packs with price less than their EV get opened makes sense. At the same time, packs with price more than their EV don't really make sense - it's better to just buy singles in that case. But to me, the comment meant that packs with worth (total value of their contents) less than their EV i.e. underperforming packs were guaranteed to be opened, so the EV of remaining packs would rise, justifying the price increase.