I like the idea, but it would need some refinement. > Juries participating get rewards (badges, recognition, opportunities as judges / advocates, etc) There a

I like the idea, but it would need some refinement. > Juries participating get rewards (badges, recognition, opportunities as judges / advocates, etc) There are also external rewards that need to be considered. For example, being a juror because you want to silence someone. I wouldn't put it past 4chan to try something like that. > The injured party can effectively e-sue Without any kind of cost or risk, this will get abused. Remember that it takes 1 person to make a report, and 12 people to form the jury. It doesn't take much to flood the "court", and then there's effectively no moderation. > The reason companies do not implement such a system is because it takes power away from them (management, staff) and gives it to the users. I don't think it's directly about power. It's largely about advertising money. They need to make sure advertisers are okay with the ads being run next to the content. Advertisers will not care that a jury voted to keep a racist tirade.