2 ms·
It sounds like you're stuck with that definition. Sometimes it's better to save money, in order to productively allocate it later. Spending non-productively is
by Geee 5y ago
It sounds like you're stuck with that definition. Sometimes it's better to save money, in order to productively allocate it later. Spending non-productively is a detriment to economy and environment.
And, because people are free to choose the better money, you can't do anything to prevent it from taking over anyway.
- arcticbull 5y agoAgain it’s strictly worse at being money. You just keep restating that it’s not instead of attempting to justify your position.