3 ms·
> I'm not sure what happened in second case and why pamac left system in broken state FWIW, as a vanilla Arch user, I have not encountered this issue. I rememb
by majewsky 5y ago
> I'm not sure what happened in second case and why pamac left system in broken state
FWIW, as a vanilla Arch user, I have not encountered this issue. I remember a time when pacman updates were kind of iffy (and in fact, pacman itself asked you to update it first before proceeding with the rest of the updates), but since 5.0, all subsequent updates have been completely unremarkable in the best way.