3 ms·

Good? Always seemed problematic so much tech was all tied up in SF and the Bay Area.

ardit33 5y ago
It is the only true city in the area, where younger people can have a urban lifestyle... the rest is depressing suburbia.... San Jose, and the rest feels like a cultural grave. The only other town that is walkable is Berkley, but that is too small for hosting large companies. Also, parts of Oakland, but the city itself has major governance issues, and crime in general. I think NYC and Austin are booming right now. While nyc is a world class city, the 'progressives' have taken over the NY State legislation, and personally it is worrying. While some of the legislation might be long overdue, and good, there are many parts of the 'progressive' movement that is just nihilistic, and destructive in the long run and it might end up goin the route of SF. So, this year will be the wait and see year on how NY will move forward. If it goes the way of SF (with destructive policies) it might not look good. But, NYC-ers are more rational, and both of the leading candidates for Mayor seem to be more in the centrist, or center left camp, and the far left / super progressive ones are not doing well.
- thereare5lights 5y ago
  > and crime in general That's no different in SF
  - cyberbanjo 5y ago
    I thought Oakland was worse
    - neltnerb 5y ago
      Oakland is a big place. It varies by neighborhood same as San Francisco. Most is fine, certainly no worse than the Tenderloin.
      - astrange 5y ago
        How does SF have so many neighborhoods when it's so small, anyway? You can walk across the city and back in a day.
        mandelbrotwurst 5y ago
        How big does a neighborhood need to be / how many should it have? The neighborhoods in SF as most people think of them are larger than the areas that many suburb residents tend to think of as defining their neighborhoods.
        astrange 5y ago
        It’s more than suburban areas bleed into each other less because you can’t walk between them - instead there’s some dense areas you drive between.
      - mandelbrotwurst 5y ago
        That's not exactly a high bar
        neltnerb 5y ago
        And the vast majority of Oakland is fine. I used an extreme example to demonstrate that the idea that Oakland has worse crime issues than SF is highly dependent on where you happen to be. Oakland is just physically huge, suggesting it has an issue with "crime in general" is myopic and ignores that almost all of it is fine, same as SF.
        mandelbrotwurst 5y ago
        Ah OK, gotcha - I misinterpreted your comment as meaning things are fine in the Tenderloin.
      - jackfruitpeel 5y ago
        I'm living in one of the nicest neighborhoods in Oakland, and I would definitely not consider it "fine". The area is beautiful, but we're plagued by gunpoint robberies, burglaries, dumping, etc — people coming in and treating us as a place to loot and leave. I love Oakland, but I'm gone as soon as our rent is up. There's a general lawlessness here that's incredibly frustrating.
- spamizbad 5y ago
  All of the cities you mention have progressive leadership and that's not likely to change. Most non-progressives have decamped to the suburbs (or "depressing suburbia" as you call it) decades ago.
- gfodor 5y ago
  When you have young kids 'depressing suburbia' can be a feature not a bug.
  - closeparen 5y ago
    Until they need to go places during the day and your whole life becomes dedicated to driving them around.
    - gfodor 5y ago
      Seems worth the additional safety and access to nature. Especially considering the alternative in my case (SF.)
      - closeparen 5y ago
        The leading cause of death in children is driving.
        uxu77whr 5y ago
        Children really shouldn't be driving in the first place.
        gfodor 5y ago
        Especially in the suburbs, I'd imagine, which would imply they're largely avoiding other causes. Great! What you should care about is P(D|city) vs P(D|suburb)
- astrange 5y ago
  NYC is just about as bad at housing as the Bay Area is, but the problem hasn't gone on for as many decades so you haven't noticed yet. NYC population is actually shrinking for this reason, and there are several silly rules (not by modern progressives) like high IZ for "affordability" that prevent all construction, and I think they're about to essentially ban new hotels. Btw, the reason progressives didn't take over before is that Cuomo was actually conspiring to make his own party the minority in the legislature, because he thought if he was forced to ever actually do anything it'd hurt a future presidential run.

It is the only true city in the area, where younger people can have a urban lifestyle... the rest is depressing suburbia.... San Jose, and the rest feels like a cultural grave. The only other town that is walkable is Berkley, but that is too small for hosting large companies. Also, parts of Oakland, but the city itself has major governance issues, and crime in general. I think NYC and Austin are booming right now. While nyc is a world class city, the 'progressives' have taken over the NY State legislation, and personally it is worrying. While some of the legislation might be long overdue, and good, there are many parts of the 'progressive' movement that is just nihilistic, and destructive in the long run and it might end up goin the route of SF. So, this year will be the wait and see year on how NY will move forward. If it goes the way of SF (with destructive policies) it might not look good. But, NYC-ers are more rational, and both of the leading candidates for Mayor seem to be more in the centrist, or center left camp, and the far left / super progressive ones are not doing well.

thereare5lights 5y ago
> and crime in general That's no different in SF
- cyberbanjo 5y ago
  I thought Oakland was worse
  - neltnerb 5y ago
    Oakland is a big place. It varies by neighborhood same as San Francisco. Most is fine, certainly no worse than the Tenderloin.
    - astrange 5y ago
      How does SF have so many neighborhoods when it's so small, anyway? You can walk across the city and back in a day.
      - mandelbrotwurst 5y ago
        How big does a neighborhood need to be / how many should it have? The neighborhoods in SF as most people think of them are larger than the areas that many suburb residents tend to think of as defining their neighborhoods.
        astrange 5y ago
        It’s more than suburban areas bleed into each other less because you can’t walk between them - instead there’s some dense areas you drive between.
    - mandelbrotwurst 5y ago
      That's not exactly a high bar
      - neltnerb 5y ago
        And the vast majority of Oakland is fine. I used an extreme example to demonstrate that the idea that Oakland has worse crime issues than SF is highly dependent on where you happen to be. Oakland is just physically huge, suggesting it has an issue with "crime in general" is myopic and ignores that almost all of it is fine, same as SF.
        mandelbrotwurst 5y ago
        Ah OK, gotcha - I misinterpreted your comment as meaning things are fine in the Tenderloin.
    - jackfruitpeel 5y ago
      I'm living in one of the nicest neighborhoods in Oakland, and I would definitely not consider it "fine". The area is beautiful, but we're plagued by gunpoint robberies, burglaries, dumping, etc — people coming in and treating us as a place to loot and leave. I love Oakland, but I'm gone as soon as our rent is up. There's a general lawlessness here that's incredibly frustrating.
spamizbad 5y ago
All of the cities you mention have progressive leadership and that's not likely to change. Most non-progressives have decamped to the suburbs (or "depressing suburbia" as you call it) decades ago.
gfodor 5y ago
When you have young kids 'depressing suburbia' can be a feature not a bug.
- closeparen 5y ago
  Until they need to go places during the day and your whole life becomes dedicated to driving them around.
  - gfodor 5y ago
    Seems worth the additional safety and access to nature. Especially considering the alternative in my case (SF.)
    - closeparen 5y ago
      The leading cause of death in children is driving.
      - uxu77whr 5y ago
        Children really shouldn't be driving in the first place.
      - gfodor 5y ago
        Especially in the suburbs, I'd imagine, which would imply they're largely avoiding other causes. Great! What you should care about is P(D|city) vs P(D|suburb)
astrange 5y ago
NYC is just about as bad at housing as the Bay Area is, but the problem hasn't gone on for as many decades so you haven't noticed yet. NYC population is actually shrinking for this reason, and there are several silly rules (not by modern progressives) like high IZ for "affordability" that prevent all construction, and I think they're about to essentially ban new hotels. Btw, the reason progressives didn't take over before is that Cuomo was actually conspiring to make his own party the minority in the legislature, because he thought if he was forced to ever actually do anything it'd hurt a future presidential run.