5 ms·
A lot of people find Matrix completely unpalatable. Why would they support it in this way? IRC works and has worked for decades. Its minimal, text-only, no bs,
by metroholografix 5y ago
A lot of people find Matrix completely unpalatable. Why would they support it in this way?
IRC works and has worked for decades. Its minimal, text-only, no bs, no distractions nature is its greatest asset. Client support, programmability, and ease of integration too.
The folks that like Matrix are already using it. The folks that have stuck with IRC for decades will not abandon it for a protocol they deem to be inferior.
- natural219 5y agoTrust me, I get that; the main argument is that, in protocol wars, there's strength in numbers; IRC is a waning protocol, Matrix is a waxing protocol. I'm not saying people must change what's working for them already; my only case is that _if_ what _was_ working for you is now broken (the freenode network), you have a new opportunity to re-evaluate your position. That's all. You don't even have to go "all in" on all the fancy new Matrix stuff; just write a wrapper to comply with being a "homeserver", and continue using the IRC API with no changes. If not, that's also fine, I'm not that invested in this personally.
- anticensor 5y agoThe opposition might be due to the fact that Matrix is persistent, IRC is ephemeral.