4 ms·
As a journalist who has ben taught to always attribute quotations and sources, I agree with Gruber. Ina's attribution to "an enthusiast site" is disingenuous, l
by candeira 15y ago
As a journalist who has ben taught to always attribute quotations and sources, I agree with Gruber. Ina's attribution to "an enthusiast site" is disingenuous, like those non-apology apologies that say "I am sorry you felt insulted" instead of "I am sorry I insulted you". His criticism of Fried for referencing the URL instead of the name of the blog is also spot on.
Gruber also is right to make a distinction between writing that pretty much "consume(s) the story", and for that reason requires full attribution, as it will be read by many as a piece of text with no links, and his own teasers that give nothing away but a link to the real story, so attribution is less important.
His "order of preference" listing of how to give attribution is an object lesson in digital journalism. I have forwarded this piece to my friends who teach in J-schools.
- kenjackson 15y agoNo the real lesson is don't do stories sourced by Apple fan sites. This was a great example of a story that wasn't worth covering to begin with, and Apple zealots will tear into you for not showing proper deference to the Apple gods. The one thing the tech industry could do without are so many pointless Apple stories.
- candeira 15y agoI can agree with that. They could write less Apple stories. But if they do write Apple stories, they should recognise the people whose work they draw from as colleagues in journalism, not dismiss them as "enthusiasts".