3 ms·
I think the issue here is that 35Wh per transaction is still a million times less efficient than traditional databases. The MacBook example is just meant to giv
by johndough 5y ago
I think the issue here is that 35Wh per transaction is still a million times less efficient than traditional databases. The MacBook example is just meant to give a frame of reference for how much 35Wh is.
- DennisP 5y agoSure, no argument there. I'm really glad proof-of-stake is close. It's just that GP made it sound like issuing three transactions would actually drain your battery, so I wanted to clarify that.