5 ms·
I suspect this worked because the person was, indeed, there. I mean, not in the same room, but down the hall or so. You can have the most perfect rendering in
by lultimouomo 5y ago
I suspect this worked because the person was, indeed, there.
I mean, not in the same room, but down the hall or so.
You can have the most perfect rendering in the world and 100ms of latency will be enough to make the experience miserable.
- akie 5y agoDepends on how much bandwidth it needs. I've been video conferencing a lot (who didn't, this past year) and even with people on the other side of the globe I don't recall latency ever being a problem.
- dash2 5y agoAlso depends what you're doing. Singing together is impossible over standard video conferencing, for example.
- everyone 5y agoyeah, like if your playing keys live for example, you want your audio interface to have around 6ms latency max (the delay time between your finger pressing a key and you hearing the sound from pressing that key) above that and it starts to become detrimental to your playing. above 10 and you can barely play.
- closeparen 5y agoYou could imagine commercial/institutional sites hundreds to thousands of miles apart with <10ms latency on dedicated fiber.
- tomklein 5y agoWouldn’t that be way faster than the speed of light?
- gearhart 5y agoDepends how many thousands ;) light travels about 3000km in 10ms https://www.google.com/search?q=speed+of+light+*+10ms https://www.google.com/search?q=speed+of+light+*+10ms
- soVeryTired 5y agoThat’s in a vacuum, in a straight line. In fibre optic cable, light travels around two thirds of that speed.