Well, at least they take the cake when it comes to running CMS with the largest heap size? It is also quite ironic that they paid for Zing C4, and then came up

Well, at least they take the cake when it comes to running CMS with the largest heap size? It is also quite ironic that they paid for Zing C4, and then came up with "P90 average RPC queue time" as the metric, ignoring Gil Tene's wisdom that you should never average percentiles. Another problematic statement is this: > which in turn decreases request latency and increases throughput Gil Tene wants you to measure p99.99 or pmax, so that you will pay for Zing C4 to get lower tail latency, while sacrificing some throughput. If you end up getting both lower tail latency and more throughput, then something is already very wrong with the existing setup (i.e. the full GC).