5 ms·
The real issue of course with this isn't the memes, it is that it is licensed GPL v3.0. I don't think many people are going to use it because of that.
by graton 5y ago
The real issue of course with this isn't the memes, it is that it is licensed GPL v3.0.
I don't think many people are going to use it because of that.
- JoeyBananas 5y agoLGPL is a Chad license. MIT is for virgins.
- 74d-fe6-2c6 5y agono, the Chad way would be to not specify a license at all ... what's next? talking with str() about its feelings?
- 1_player 5y agoThe other way around. MIT is for the "I have better things to do with my life than caring about what you do with my code" chad, (L)GPL is for the apprehensive virgin.
- Joker_vD 5y agoThere is "free as in free beer", "free as in free speech", and then there is "free as in GPLv3". Because, you see, being prohibited from doing quite a number of things with a piece of software is the ultimate freedom™ (not actually freedom, just a 7-letter combination that looks like the word "freedom" but has its own specific meaning, further information available upon request).
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ariedro 5y agoThe "do what you want with the software I wrote freely, even if you gain money with it and give nothing in return" approach sounds pretty virgin to me
- 1_player 5y agoIt's possible to make something and not expect anything in return. I couldn't care less if my quick JS library makes money to anyone. And more power to you if you can make a living by building a whole company based upon my left-pad code. Charity and generosity is chad-like.
- yesenadam 5y agoMaybe the Do What the Fuck You Want to Public License ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL http://www.wtfpl.net/ http://www.wtfpl.net/
- crapster 5y agoyou mean soydevs from "fagman" like corpos would not able to use it right? I do not see what problems GPL Gigachads may be experiencing with chadstr.h Stop using cuck licenses and contribute back to them