4 ms·
Wouldn’t it better to prevent procreation? No children, no child abuse. Cant even hide abuse that doesn’t exist by keeping off the internet with it. Makes abou
by falcolas 5y ago
Wouldn’t it better to prevent procreation? No children, no child abuse. Cant even hide abuse that doesn’t exist by keeping off the internet with it.
Makes about as much sense as banning encryption to prevent abuse.
So long as deviant minds exist, child abuse will exist. Even if you could perfectly prosecute all transmissions of the resulting artifacts.
- antisol 5y agoOMG what an excellent suggestion! Banning encryption won't stop all child abuse but this totally sensible measure is guaranteed to do just that! You, sir (or madam), are a genius! The only question in my mind now is whether we should kill all the children out there today or just sterilise everybody. If we don't kill them, some of them might be abused between now and the time they reach adulthood. So it's pretty obvious to me that for the sake of the children we should kill all the children. It's really the only logical conclusion. Won't somebody please think of the children! (and kill them)