3 ms·
>but if you check the code for udevd at this moment you can see a lot of use of utility headers that are not really appropriate for a libudev: That's fair. >T
by totony 5y ago
>but if you check the code for udevd at this moment you can see a lot of use of utility headers that are not really appropriate for a libudev:
That's fair.
>This is not code that could be deleted from systemd if it was separated.
Why not? You could make a library out of those utility functions and use it from both systemd and udev (without having to include most of libsystemd which doesn't seem useful for udev).
- zxzax 5y agoI don't have a quote handy, but systemd maintainers have previously said they are not interested in also maintaining a giant public API of utility functions, on top of everything else.