3 ms·
What’s wrong with this article? They explain exactly what they mean here > Göbekli Tepe was a ceremonial religious site, not a city—there is no evidence that
by edgyquant 5y ago
What’s wrong with this article? They explain exactly what they mean here
> Göbekli Tepe was a ceremonial religious site, not a city—there is no evidence that anyone lived there. Moreover, there are no domesticated animal bones, no metal tools, no inscriptions or writing, and not even pottery—all products that much later “high civilizations” produced.