3 ms·
Bombing civilian buildings is not a way to decrease casualty numbers on both sides of a conflict. The more peaceful alternative to bombing civilian buildings is
by banannaise 5y ago
Bombing civilian buildings is not a way to decrease casualty numbers on both sides of a conflict. The more peaceful alternative to bombing civilian buildings is not sending leaflets and then bombing civilian buildings, it is declining to bomb civilian buildings.
Using slightly less violence than is available to you does not make you the good guy, especially when the violence you use is drastically higher than the violence that is even possible from the other side.
- golergka 5y ago> civilian Citation needed. If a building is used for warfare, it is not civilian building.
- banannaise 5y ago> If a building is used for warfare, it is not civilian building. Citation needed! Show that all the buildings Israel has bombed were being used for warfare.