> With a zoonotic source China is still at fault. Is it really though? Is that then not a "shit happens" case? No one seems to be particularly angry at how SAR

> With a zoonotic source China is still at fault. Is it really though? Is that then not a "shit happens" case? No one seems to be particularly angry at how SARS started, or Ebola in Africa etc. It just seems understood that often humans and animals mingle closely together, and then yes, bad things happen, but it's just part of doing business. Anyway China is implying already that this is what's going on, so I can't see what they would have to lose by confirming it.