3 ms·
I feel like there's a lot of Chartjunk [1] here. Some of it is necessary for interactivity, but there should be a middle ground. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w
by synack 5y ago
I feel like there's a lot of Chartjunk [1] here. Some of it is necessary for interactivity, but there should be a middle ground.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartjunk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartjunk
- azalemeth 5y agoQuite. To be honest, I hoped the original URL would be more like this one -- https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html -- which is much more of a "metric system standards" page...
- eclarkso 5y agoWhat, specifically, do you think is chartjunk? There are things that might be optional in some cases, but the article specifically names them as such and has a whole section on ways to combine different elements in different ways?
- drewcon 5y agoAside from the branding section, which author handles realistically...I don’t see anything I would consider chart junk.