4 ms·
Why are people insisting this came from a guy eating a bat-burger and bat-fries meal with absolutely no evidence? My common sense info is that a super-virus po
by jb775 5y ago
Why are people insisting this came from a guy eating a bat-burger and bat-fries meal with absolutely no evidence?
My common sense info is that a super-virus popped up right down the street from a lab designed to create super-viruses(funding signed off by Fauci, and much historic public info/discussion exists about what type of work was being done at the Wuhan lab), China disappeared the lab people, and biggest red-flag of all is that the corrupt propaganda media (CNN, MSNBC, Business Insider, etc) is trying to rub it in everyone's face that the lab story isn't true.
Next line of discussion is how much jail time Fauci should get for enabling blatant malpractice while setting himself up to make a fortune.
- kelnos 5y ago> Why are people insisting this came from a guy eating a bat-burger and bat-fries meal with absolutely no evidence? The answer is right in the article, at the very end: the virus was found in 6% of samples taken from the market, with most of the virus-positive samples found in areas that had wildlife in it. That's not "no evidence" at all. I would rate it as slightly -- but only slightly -- more compelling than the circumstantial evidence pointing to a lab leak.
- Paradigma11 5y agoSo there is evidence that Fauci signed off on funding of gain of function research in the Wuhan lab?
- newacct583 5y agoThere is not. People get so offended when accused of being conspiracists, but then they rattle off this kind of fever swamp nonsense. That there was a genuine debate within the research community on GoF work is true enough, but this bit is just a ridiculous smear by the right against someone who (amazingly, when you think about it) has become a "political enemy".