5 ms·
Isn't it better that a coalition won instead of Google? Now at least these companies will not sue each other. Its much better that way. Google should have joine
by yalogin 15y ago
Isn't it better that a coalition won instead of Google? Now at least these companies will not sue each other. Its much better that way. Google should have joined the group rather than going itself.
Also Nortel was a really huge company and a really good one at their peak. So its not surprising it amassed that many patents or that they fetch that much value.
- sorbus 15y agoGoogle expressed an interest in using the patents defensively, and implied that it would share them with the open source community. If the coalition intends to use the patents offensively, which is very plausible considering the companies involved, then it is not better that it won.
- brudgers 15y agoNations express an interest in obtaining nuclear weapons for peaceful purposes. One side effect of obtaining them is that it limits their neighbor's options when the tanks roll into their back yard. Google is no more benign than any other company.
- fleitz 15y agoNo kidding, I heard in the spirit of innovation, open source, and allowing consumers to get a better ad display and search experience that Google will soon release it's search algorithms and ad sense code for others to improve on. /snark.
- cromwellian 15y agoReally? Then why did Google buy On2's video codec patents and then give them away?
- kjksf 15y agoActually, based on past history, it is. As far as I know, Google hasn't sued anyone for violating their patents. Apple, RIM, Nokia, Microsoft sued plenty of companies in clear attempts to further their already strong position in the market. Facts contradict your opinions.