4 ms·
The video addresses it. 1. We have strong suspicion that the virus was going around in early December, away from the Wuhan wet market. 2. If the source was na
by screye 5y ago
The video addresses it.
1. We have strong suspicion that the virus was going around in early December, away from the Wuhan wet market.
2. If the source was natural and zootonic, we would have expected to find the intermediate animal by now. For Sars1 and Mers, we found that animal within 4 months and 9 months respectively. It's been 18 months since Covid19, and we have no clue what that animal despite better science and astronomically more investment.
- flukus 5y ago> if the source was natural and zootonic, we would have expected to find the intermediate animal by now. Only if you assume it's both widespread and endemic in the intermediate animal population. If it's spreading at low levels through that population for some reason (like being a less social animal) then it's trying to find a needle in a haystack, and that's on top of the needle/haystack of identifying the correct animal and population. If it's not endemic we may never find it, perhaps the intermediate population were well on their way to herd immunity before the virus jumped to humans leaving little to no trace. There are some other possibilities too, like it could have been transmitting undetected among relatively isolated humans (like small farming villages) for some time before an infected farmer visited a market. This would significantly broaden the scope of when and where the infected animal population was. That we haven't found the source yet is incredibly weak evidence.