5 ms·
> Whether they think there was none because they didn't bother to look The origin was politicized in the US and taboo to even question it, so few did. It was l
by throwkeep 5y ago
> Whether they think there was none because they didn't bother to look
The origin was politicized in the US and taboo to even question it, so few did. It was labeled a crazy conspiracy theory by the media and that shut the door on open inquiry until recently.
- prox 5y agoThis is why there is a big difference between skepticism and conspiracy. A skeptic digs deeper to gather more data and facts, a conspiracy loosely joins a few data points and makes a poor conjecture. Conspiracy is political ammunition, skepticism is healthy debate and gladly welcomes more data.
- andrewclunn 5y ago"Skepticsm" is when over educated pseudo-intellectuals want THEIR theories to have the ring of "science," while dismissing others as conspiracy theorists.
- TheAdamAndChe 5y agoAll of science is driven by hypothesis, but those hypotheses don't just appear out of nowhere. Suspicion, bias, and bad data can all drive focus on a particular field. In that way, such conjecture is a powerful scientific tool that in my opinion is too often dismissed.