3 ms·

I think it may get popular for Java framework fans. Among themselves folks may bicker about J2EE, Spring or Quarkus, or Oracle Fusion, Microprofile and myriad o

by geodel 5y ago

I think it may get popular for Java framework fans. Among themselves folks may bicker about J2EE, Spring or Quarkus, or Oracle Fusion, Microprofile and myriad others. But the core idea is that anyone using Java directly with some help of standard and third party libs is old fossil and should eliminated from project/company or even better from workforce entirely. I think this language is another form of framework and unsurprisingly developed in Java for java users.

klag 5y ago
The interpreter has been developed in Java but, from a linguistic perspective, Jolie is completely independent from it. It is possible to implement the interpreter using another technology. Thus, it is wrong to state that it is another Java framework, but it is true that, by now, it is coupled with Java because you need a JVM for running it.