3 ms·
All trees, even those which are not cut down for constructing a sailing ship, also eventually rot and release most of their captured carbon. Only those which ar
by LeifCarrotson 5y ago
All trees, even those which are not cut down for constructing a sailing ship, also eventually rot and release most of their captured carbon. Only those which are burned efficiently in a high-oxygen environment turn completely into CO2.
In a natural forest, it's true that a tiny fraction of this biomass derived from atmospheric CO2 rots incompletely on the forest floor and is turned into a small amount of carbon-rich soil, but this process is glacially slow. [1] suggests single-digit grams per square meter per year. Rotting on the seafloor may or may not be any better or worse.
Relatedly, carbon sequestration projects have biological carbon intake as one option. Instead of using industrial-scale chemical or electrical reactions to pull carbon from the atmosphere, use photosynthesis. Grow some trees, process them into ethanol and graphite, and bury the carbon-rich waste forever.
[1]: DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-92706-8_11 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225314103_Soil_Carbon_Accumulation_in_Old-Growth_Forests https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225314103_Soil_Carb...
- dtech 5y agoTree contains X Co2 => Tree gets cut down without replacement => ship gets made and rots => X Co2 releases into atmosphere. Net Co2 = +X Tree contains X Co2 => Tree dies => New tree grows in opened up space. Net Co2 = 0
- marcinzm 5y agoWhy do you assume the tree would not be replaced, we plant more trees than we cut down nowadays for example. The only reason to not replant the tree is if the land was being used for something but then the tree would have been cut down anyway ship or not.
- rocqua 5y agoThe original quote at the top of this thread says that ships were build from trees that were felled _and not replaced_. The discussion started from that assumption.
- socialdemocrat 5y agoAnyone interested in a fair comparison should point out the error of that comparison. Using wood in a managed forest it’s not a bad thing. It’s greatly preferable to extracting coal and oil.