4 ms·
> As much as I feel like NY City transit deserves state-level funding, I don't feel comfortable taxing people in low-income rural areas of the state $330 a year
by chimeracoder 5y ago
> As much as I feel like NY City transit deserves state-level funding, I don't feel comfortable taxing people in low-income rural areas of the state $330 a year for this
The MTA already invests disproportionate levels of funds on commuter rail services that are used ~exclusively by non-city residents, far out of line with their usage. It's totally reasonable to have them contribute more, instead of forcing the city to shoulder an even greater burden.
And that's just looking at MTA funds, not even considering the amount of money spent on maintaining free roads and highways in other parts of the state (the funding for which is already drawn disproportionately from NYC's tax base).
- nerdponx 5y agoMetro North fares are also pretty high, and the suit-and-tie Metro North riders also aren't the people I had in mind who would be hurt by an extra $330/year tax. Highway maintenance is another story and you have a good point there. But I really wish that people wouldn't treat the state's finances like a battle of wills between the poor oppressed Westchester commuters and Manhattan tech bros versus the greedy rural upstate leeches.