4 ms·
I want it. You could argue that the current approach of intrastructure-as-code has it backwards: Currently, you define infrastructure, then deploy your code.
by Garlef 5y ago
I want it.
You could argue that the current approach of intrastructure-as-code has it backwards:
Currently, you define infrastructure, then deploy your code.
Instead, I'd like to be able to write code and then connect the code through infrastructure abstractions.
- fmontesi 5y agoIndeed, one of the nicest aspects of Jolie is that you can (semi-)automatically extract the definition of the infrastructure that you need from your code. An example of a preliminary application that you might find interesting: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09518 https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09518