1) Citing research from the University of Chicago and other reputable research institutions is not "saying blatant untruths". Disregarding all of the research t

1) Citing research from the University of Chicago and other reputable research institutions is not "saying blatant untruths". Disregarding all of the research that doesn't agree with your view point and declaring them "not science" and "blatant untruths" is just being an idealogue. The conclusion is not crystal clear at all. It is a mixed bag, as anyone can clearly see in Google Scholar. 2) Nonprofits ARE companies and many of them (including the College Board) make a lot of money. 1) The College Board's total revenue is about 1 Billion dollars per year. 2) The executives earn roughly $500k - $1 million annually in total compensation (salary + bonuses). Of course, they are going to say that their product is the best. Just like Harvard, Stanford, and any educational institution (all nonprofits) are going to advertise that their methods are the best. Even the NHL is a nonprofit. Do you think the NHL is going to be the best source for research on hockey player injuries? No. Because they have a financial interest in not doing so. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/09/30/how-much-do-big-education-nonprofits-pay-their-bosses-quite-a-bit-it-turns-out/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/09/...