4 ms·
How long does it take on a Ryzen 9 5950X
by tobyhinloopen 5y ago
How long does it take on a Ryzen 9 5950X
- Synaesthesia 5y agoNote that's a 16 core CPU with 105W TDP compared to a quad core < 10W M1
- jbverschoor 5y agoYup, and the new macbook pro will probably be twice as fast
- ChuckNorris89 5y agoSource?
- jbverschoor 5y agoGut feeling ;-)
- cbsmith 5y ago5850U is an 8 core CPU with a TDP that is adjustable between 10-25w. If you want to keep it to 4 cores just so it is a fair fight, there's the 5400U/5450U. AMD does pretty well...
- Synaesthesia 5y agoYeah I'd say the M1 and latest AMD CPUs are virtually tied for fastest single threaded performance, edging out the best by Intel. But for something like compilation which is multithreaded obviously the higher core count will win.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- InvaderFizz 5y agoRan a few cycles on my 5950x hackintosh: invaderfizz@FIZZ-5950X:~$ hyperfine 'cargo -q install -f ripgrep' Benchmark #1: cargo -q install -f ripgrep Time (mean ± σ): 19.190 s ± 0.392 s [User: 294.890 s, System: 17.144 s] Range (min … max): 18.352 s … 19.803 s 10 runs The CPU was averaging about 50% load, the dependencies go really fast when they can all parallel compile, but then the larger portions are stuck with single-thread performance.
- V1ndaar 5y agoJust for reference (5950x too): ran 3 times just measuring with `time` on void linux using cargo from xbps. Mean of the last two runs (first was syncing and downloading) was ~13.8 s.
- peteri 5y agoMy 5950X came in faster running in WSL2, but then I do have a Samsung 980 PRO running in a PCIe 4.0 slot. Benchmark #1: cargo -q install -f ripgrep Time (mean ± σ): 11.585 s ± 0.474 s [User: 176.733 s, System: 5.677 s] Range (min … max): 11.271 s … 12.867 s 10 runs Which I suspect leans towards an IO bottleneck.