4 ms·
> In years to come we will look down on current working conditions in the same way we currently do with 15hr factory shifts during the industrial revolution. A
by akersten 5y ago
> In years to come we will look down on current working conditions in the same way we currently do with 15hr factory shifts during the industrial revolution.
Absolutely agreed. Working for someone else for 8 of the best hours of the day (if you're lucky, and not pressured into 9 or 10 hours), plus the surrounding 1 hour on either side to get ready/commute, for 5/7 of the days of the week, is no way to live.
> most jobs should be offered on either 4 days (80% salary)
Woah, hang on. Are we currently working at 50% pay compared to those 15-hour factory days? No. So how does it follow that a further reduction to 4 days should merit a pay cut? Our target should be 4 or even 3 days at 100% pay. Productivity has skyrocketed and wages have stagnated[0]. We deserve fair compensation for our labor, don't be so eager to discount it.
[0]: https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/ https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/
- philmcp 5y agoI'm totally with you, although if I'm being honest I think the fairer amount would be 90-95% of salary for 4 days. The only reason I'm pushing for 4 days (80% salary) or 5 days (100% salary) is to try and get companies on board. Working a 4 day week is still a taboo topic to most c-suites - I think a small reduction in salary would be a good "first step" towards normalising the 4 day week @ ~100% salary.
- tekknik 5y agoFor imported labor or those workaholic types, how would you keep those choosing less work competitive? Why would a company not hire someone willing to work full time? I’d love to work 3-4 days a week but without mandates I see us ending right back where we are. In short, greed will ruin this idea if it’s left as optional.